THE acquittal of Jonathon Brown on 10 counts of rape and sexual assault of a girl again highlights the problems of naming sex case defendants.
The law currently forbids publicising the identity of such victims but allows defendants to be named. A law was introduced in the 1970s granting anonymity to both defendants and claimants, but this was later repealed for defendants
The argument hinges mainly on the open nature of British justice, along with the fact that subsequent publicity can encourage other victims to come forward.
The reality for defendants, though, is very damaging. Mr Brown, from Smithills, always maintained his innocence and it took a jury 10 minutes to clear him of all charges. However, he has received threats on social media and had his name dragged through the mud.
He wants those convicted of sex crimes not named until they’ve been found guilty in court, and I agree.
Today’s communications’ explosion means sex case defendants immediately face trial by social media, and the law must reflect this.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here