Our discussion on 'assisted death' was timely as various other bodies are currently talking about the subject. It is a very important issue and cannot be kept concealed 'under the carpet'. <p>
Whilst it is correct for the 'final decision' to be made by the individual or any other person 'with given legal authority'( thru living will etc) , that 'choice' must be a well-informed one. In other words, it should only be undertaken after all factors have been taken in consideration. And in a situation like this , the 'medical' status in details must be looked at. The attending doctor (s) therefore will remain crucially important and their observations relevant. <p>
Some eminent doctors are professing total 'neutrality' with the entire 'burden' of decision on 'lay' care-givers or relatives. They use the terminology 'society' ; in such a scenario what does society mean? Such 'individuial' issues warrant specific and 'individual' assessment and decision-making. Although such procedures and actions must be 'legal' eg approved by the Parliament, no 'universal' rule can be applied to all cases. <p>
Professionals must remain involved ; they may not 'direct' but they must 'advise' and provide 'advocacy' in such complex situations.
ARUP BANERJEE
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article