I FULLY understand Margaret Gilmour's points regarding causing offence.

I would not deliberately offend for the sake of it or for a cheap laugh. I would not trivialise people's race or beliefs.

However there are people who take offence at anything said contrary to their beliefs, however trivial.

We cannot edit conversation in case offence is caused. Is it fine to attack my atheist beliefs whilst walking on eggshells with someone of deep religious faith? Offence should be saved for those on all sides who voice nasty extremism and hate anyone not sharing their beliefs.

I recall an Irish cycling trip where one of the group was a Catholic priest fromBelfast, who, during the Troubles had given the last Rites to folks shot or blown up. A man of deep faith coupled with a wonderful sense of humour. Great discussions resulting in deeper understanding.

Several years ago at an Open Day at Bolton Central Mosque, I met the Imam, again a man of deep faith coupled with a lovely down to earth outlook.

What a contrast to the dreadful news of a jailed blogger in Saudi Arabia who was sentences to 1,000 lashings for promoting religious freedom. Not much humour there and little criticism. Yes it is very complicated. I am fearful that for all the wonderful support of freedom in Paris, there are British news outlets who pick and choose their targets for safety reasons. True criticism and humour can only evolve alongside true freedom.

David Sharples,

Tarbet Drive,

Breightmet.