News RSS Feed


Tell Us what you think of the news of the day

Post your views on our Forum HERE or by email to the Letters Editor HERE

VOTE: Flouride plans greeted with mixed reaction

6:45pm Wednesday 6th February 2008

comment Comments (58)   Have your say »


MULTI-MILLION pound plans to add fluoride to water have been greeted with mixed reactions in Bolton.

Health Secretary Alan Johnson has announced Government plans to pump £42 million into areas which want to add fluoride to water supplies in a bid to improve people's dental health.

Bolton children have some of worst dental health in the country, with youngsters in some areas having four times the tooth decay and problems as the national average.

But the issue has been hotly debated in the town with dentists and some MPs backing the move, while others brand it "mass medication" and raise fears of a link between fluoride and cancer and bone problems.

Chris Brooks, one of Bolton's leading NHS dentists, said: "It's a controversial issue, with many people opposing it. We hope they will come to see the benefits. It will have a major impact in driving down the misery and pain of children's tooth decay as well as the need to put youngsters under anaesthetic to remove decayed teeth."

MP for Bolton South-east, Dr Brian Iddon, added: "I'm very much pro-fluoride. It will make a big difference to the condition of teeth in Bolton's children."

But David Crausby, MP for Bolton North-east, is against adding fluoride to water supplies and believes parents should take more responsibility for their children's teeth.

He said: "This is mass medication and I will continue in the struggle against it. It shouldn't be forced on people and they should have a free choice to consume it in their water.

"If parents want to improve their children's dental health, then it's their responsibility and they should do all they can."

Last year, Bolton's Conservative and LibDem councillors voted to hold a referendum on whether fluoride should be added to the borough's water. However, because of the costs and logistics of a public vote, Bolton Council agreed it would only take place next year if North West Strategic Health Authority carries out public consultation on the subject.

Health chiefs are currently waiting for the authority's Fluoridation Evaluation Group to report on the matter before deciding whether to launch consultation.

Currently, about six million people in England, mainly in the North-east and the West Midlands, receive water containing fluoridation.

Children in our area are more than twice as likely to have tooth decay as youngsters in Birmingham, where fluoride has been added for more than 40 years.

A spokesman for Bolton Primary Care Trust, which funds GP and dental care, said: "The national announcement on fluoride does not change anything for the PCT at the moment. We are still awaiting the outcome of the evaluation.

"It is only after that exercise is finished that a decision will be made on whether to consult local people about the issue."


Your Say Yourtheboltonnews

steve, bolton says...
6:51pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Just heard it's possible to buy toothpaste with fluoride already in it - no need to add it to the water.

Sun Tzu, says...
6:59pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Government should by first forcing food companies to cut down on the sugar in their products.

tax payer, Bolton says...
7:18pm Wed 6 Feb 08

steve wrote:
Just heard it's possible to buy toothpaste with fluoride already in it - no need to add it to the water.
I don't ingest my toothpaste enough. Those against this either are ignorant, ill-informed, or too cosmetically self conscience.

Should be left to a public vote - surely in this day in age a public vote would be well easy. The biggest obstacle to this is council apathy.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
7:29pm Wed 6 Feb 08

no proven benefits, scary stuff

steve, bolton says...
7:34pm Wed 6 Feb 08

tax payer wrote:
steve wrote: Just heard it's possible to buy toothpaste with fluoride already in it - no need to add it to the water.
I don't ingest my toothpaste enough. Those against this either are ignorant, ill-informed, or too cosmetically self conscience. Should be left to a public vote - surely in this day in age a public vote would be well easy. The biggest obstacle to this is council apathy.
My understanding is that the fluoride need not be ingested to provide the necessary benefits.

tom3465, Farnworth says...
7:36pm Wed 6 Feb 08

what next? birth control added to the water, why not if they go ahead with this they can do anything they want because they have already.dont talk about a referendum when we didnt get one on europe it will be against my fundamental human right not to take medication this will be forced on you wether you like it or notone small step for councillors a giant leap for total control over the population.anyway we know the kids dont drink water its either pop or ale these days.

john, bolton says...
7:42pm Wed 6 Feb 08

A long-overdue public health measure. There is nothing wrong with flouride as millions in other countries and other parts of Britain will testify. The benefits are well worth the cost.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
7:45pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Flouride ??Is that when you screw a bag of flour. doesnt your man thing go white ?? C'mon tell us BN. I demand a n answer

tax payer, Bolton says...
7:47pm Wed 6 Feb 08

why be concerned about fluoride when you already drink fluoxetine which does reduce fertility.

tom3465, Farnworth says...
8:00pm Wed 6 Feb 08

john wrote:
A long-overdue public health measure. There is nothing wrong with flouride as millions in other countries and other parts of Britain will testify. The benefits are well worth the cost.
so you are talking for all of us are you? either a referendum or stike it from the list of stupid things this council can do before they are voted out list.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
8:08pm Wed 6 Feb 08

so you crap.ped yourself about going to town ??

tom3465, Farnworth says...
8:15pm Wed 6 Feb 08

not at all why do a disservice to the publican theres more than one way to skin a cat zimmy lad and that particular cat has been well and truly de-hided.i just hope the football authorities put as much effort into the rememberance weekend as they have for this mass marketing exercise by the crew from salford.

Kerry, Kearsley says...
8:15pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Fluoride no.

It leads to more problems. If people want fluoride, buy tablets which are available at Boots.

We have too much already, it's in our food and drinks.

I understand it can do harm in the long term to teeth, causing pitting leading to expensive veneers or extraction not with standing bone problems in later life.

Fluoride is a tool used by the Government to cut down on NHS spending. Why do you think there are no NHS dentists ? Because, the magic bullet is fluoride.

Brian Iddon, Scientist, retiring at the next election, probably onto the board of a Chemical Company.

No more additives to the food chain.

PJ, says...
8:18pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Flouride in water to improve childrens teeth....one problem CHILDREN DONT DRINK WATER!! Thats why they've got rotten teeth... its fizzy drinks that need the flouride.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
8:18pm Wed 6 Feb 08

So you crap.ped yourselves again just as you did on Bolton station years back.
So you stay behind closed doors afraid of what may happen.
white feathers to the bolton mob

gm, lancs says...
8:19pm Wed 6 Feb 08

not sure about the mass medication argument, theres vitamins and minerals and chemicals added to food which we are not often made aware of, if people do not want flouride they could use bottled water. if it benefits our teeth and health as much as the dentists say then it sounds like a good idea.

BoltonDave, Tonge Moor says...
8:28pm Wed 6 Feb 08

tax payer wrote:
steve wrote: Just heard it's possible to buy toothpaste with fluoride already in it - no need to add it to the water.
I don't ingest my toothpaste enough. Those against this either are ignorant, ill-informed, or too cosmetically self conscience. Should be left to a public vote - surely in this day in age a public vote would be well easy. The biggest obstacle to this is council apathy.
Public vote? Ha Ha Ha! This is labour Britain we live in. They aren't interested in what we think or want. How many fools voted them back in only to find themselves worse off than 10 years ago.
All the lies and deceit. Votes don't mean diddly in this country run by fascists. Do as they say and command!

inigo, smithfield says...
8:49pm Wed 6 Feb 08

I'm sure I heard this morning that mass medication via fluoride will reduce cavities in the teeth of children by just 15%. Is it really worth it?

tosh, says...
9:39pm Wed 6 Feb 08

Keeping kids teeth clean prevents decay. Does this mean that todays parents are to idle to get their children to clean their teeth?

RW, says...
10:51pm Wed 6 Feb 08

A few minutes of searching on the internet has just convinced me to use bottled water from now.

steve, bolton says...
11:36pm Wed 6 Feb 08

RW wrote:
A few minutes of searching on the internet has just convinced me to use bottled water from now.
Well be careful to check the dates because much of the bottled water on sale can be months old.

Expat Allan, Borogoves says...
12:39am Thu 7 Feb 08

Zimmy:
I agree we you should not have flouride (as stated in the headline)to Bolton water - could be a sticky wicket!
However fluoride is a whole different matter, and in locations where it has been in effect for some time has reduced the number of cavities (and hence fillings) of the population by 90% without any damage to healthy teeth and gums being recorded - as claimed by Kerry from Kearsley

Expat Allan, Borogoves says...
12:42am Thu 7 Feb 08

Sorry - delete the "you"

Tony, perth Australia says...
5:48am Thu 7 Feb 08

Untill the age of thirty I lived in Bolton and had many problems with my teeth.I then emigrated to Perth Western Ausrtalia and have only seen a dentist once in the past thirty years.We have fluoride in our water so it sure worked for me!

David, Sharples says...
8:09am Thu 7 Feb 08

This is a slippery slope. What else might the government want to put in the water,'for our own good'

rc1972, Bolton says...
8:21am Thu 7 Feb 08

It seems to me that the health benefits do notmatch the possible long term effects on the population. Have a look at the American States trying to get Floride removed from their water. It is pretty hard to find a dentist these days and I bet that adding this to the water will save the pct a fortune in recruiting and retaining dentists to the NHS. I myself will buy bottled water and clean my teath thanks...

amosc99, Overseas says...
9:10am Thu 7 Feb 08

tom3465 wrote:
john wrote: A long-overdue public health measure. There is nothing wrong with flouride as millions in other countries and other parts of Britain will testify. The benefits are well worth the cost.
so you are talking for all of us are you? either a referendum or stike it from the list of stupid things this council can do before they are voted out list.
This is not a council led opprtunity - unfortunately.

IT is being done by United Utilities (a completely indepedent company - owned by the Yanks - from the council and control ALL the water in the north-west region!!!)

Secondly before anyone mentions it - it, also, is NOT the policy of the EU. THey have left that decision up to the different countries but advise that it can cause bad reactions in quite a percentage of the population.

Thirdly if the EU commssion thinks its unsafe for a certain number of people, within the Common Market, then why poison people with it!!! Does Human Rights come into play here????

Jethro Tull, Bolton says...
9:15am Thu 7 Feb 08

The very idea of putting fluoride in our water is a complete disgrace. Fluoride is a waste product which chemical companies don't know what to do with, so, putting it in our water is very convenient for them. Fluoride detrimentally affects neuro transmitters in the brain, so it would also be very convenient to Govt to have a dumbed down population. The following link should help some of the doubters.

http://www.prisonpla
net.com/articles/jan
uary2008/011508_fluo
ride_horror.htm


Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
9:39am Thu 7 Feb 08

Thanks Jethro.

After reading the link and other including the BBC. I can only recoil in horror at what they're proposing, it's like a Nazi experiment.

Adding a Part II Poison to the water. A chemical waste product used in drugs such as Prozac and worse..Sarin nerve Gas.

I read also Hazel "munchkin" Blears comment to end all condescending comment which read.

"Experience of oral health promotion projects shows that it is much harder to establish regular tooth-brushing in deprived areas, because of the costs of toothpaste and, perhaps, because of the less ordered lifestyles lived by families."

As some of you rightly point out, what's next on Labours Nanny agenda ?

I've often thought, the reason why the Government allow supermarkets to sell booze at rock bottom prices or borrow like it's going out of fashion, a form of control, if were all rat legged or hocked up, were not making a fuss, and up in arms to the many things that go on.

erichyland, says...
10:01am Thu 7 Feb 08

Teeth only rot if children have too much sugar - sweets, fizzy drinks etc. It is part of good parenting to let children only have what is good for them. The odd treat, sure, that's probably good for them too, but not all day every day. It is to easy for parents to say, I don't care, let someone else sort it.

chas, suffolk says...
10:02am Thu 7 Feb 08

What a choice. Good teeth or cancer. Mind you, I am not a lover of so called 'experts'.

gazz_ball - Supera Moras!, bolton says...
10:20am Thu 7 Feb 08

I drink about 3-4 litres of tap water a day, I don't want this polluting with something that is uncertain. I clean my teeth and use mouth wash. I find that works for me. Again, this demonstrates either bending over backwards to suit the lazy, or as someone else posted a way to dispose of extra flouride or a cheap way to try and avoid the problem of a lack of NHS dentists.

Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
10:39am Thu 7 Feb 08

It's appeasement of the lazy and idle. Labours Children and does not tackle the problem.

Solution, we'll throw £40 million at it, that'll make us look good.

Gazz, think, there you are lifting your weights, next minute snap, wrist gone and all because they poisoned you a Part II Poison, extreme but possible.

Has anybody noticed, kids from Caribbean heritage, generally have beautiful teeth ? Same with many Asian kids.

Sporty people, generally have good gnashers. Would it not be better to get the kids out playing and on sugar free diets ? (adults too !)

Chris Brooks<Pro - Fluoride>, Bolton says...
10:54am Thu 7 Feb 08

chas, have you compared deaths from cancer in fluoridated West Midlands & non - fluoridated North-West? 40 years of drinking "poison" seems to have had absolutely no harmful effects.I know of no better pilot study proving the safety of water fluoridation.

Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
11:03am Thu 7 Feb 08

I'm surprised a Health Professional would advocate the use of Poison.

In your position,should you not be educating people rather than poisoning them ?

If people are adamant they want poison in the water, let them buy tablets to add to their own ?

chas, suffolk says...
11:06am Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris Brooks. Most of our food and drink contain a small amount of poison, but if our immune systems are working properly, then they will cause little or no harm. However, if you drink a lot, like gazz_ball it could do harm.

boris, west sussex says...
11:23am Thu 7 Feb 08

For Christ's sake, when will they leave us alone, we are not children, stop treating us as village idiots.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
11:27am Thu 7 Feb 08

must resist

boris, west sussex says...
11:47am Thu 7 Feb 08

Some researchers believe that fluorine is a carcinogen. Others protest that the results are not yet conclusive. The Argonne National Laboratory reported in 1988 "The ability of fluoride to transform normal cells into cancer cells."

Dr. Takeki Tsutsui and co-workers of the Nippon Dental College in Japan showed that fluoride not only caused genetic damage but was also capable of transforming normal cells into cancer cells.

In one report, the US Government investigated 156 cancer deaths over 3 years. They concluded that fluoride accumulates in body tissues and may eventually cause cancer and/or other fatal illnesses.

The research of Dr Dean Burk, former Chief Chemist of the National Cancer Institute showed that 10,000 or more fluoridation-linked cancer deaths occur yearly in the United States.

Since 1990, the National Cancer Institute, the New Jersey Department of Health, and the Safe Water Foundation all found that the incidence of osteosarcoma (a type of bone cancer) was substantially higher in young men exposed to fluoridated water as compared to those who were not.

A study by Procter and Gamble showed that as little as half the amount of fluoride used to fluoridate public water supplies resulted in a sizable and significant increase in genetic damage.

"In cultured human and rodent cells, the weight of evidence leads to the conclusion that fluoride exposure results in increased chromosome aberrations ".

boris, west sussex says...
11:50am Thu 7 Feb 08

Dr. John Yiamouyiannis estimates that 30,000 - 50,000 people die from flouride poisoning each year. In his book, Fluoride: The Aging Factor, he lists studies describing fluoride's negative effects on the immune system. Many studies have found that people living in fluoridated areas had a decreased migration rate of white blood cells. Other studies describe genetic and chromosomal damage to animals drinking fluoridated water. He warns "Before any disease is even noticeable, the acceleration of the aging process by fluoride is already occurring at the biochemical level, by means of enzyme inhibition, collagen breakdown, genetic damage and/or disruption of the immune system."




Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
12:05pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Boris, does this mean the Government hit the jackpot ?

The people zombies and quiet, best of all for them no pensioners ?

stan evans, bolton says...
12:06pm Thu 7 Feb 08

It is the parents responsibility to look after ther kids teeth A big NO to fluride

Chris Brooks<Pro - Fluoride>, Bolton says...
12:07pm Thu 7 Feb 08

boris, that will explain why people in the West-Midlands have a greater life expectancy than the people in the North-West,even though they have been poisoned for 40 years.

boris, west sussex says...
12:09pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris Brooks<Pro - Fluoride>, Bolton wrote

boris, that will explain why people in the West-Midlands have a greater life expectancy than the people in the North-West,even though they have been poisoned for 40 years.



Where is the evidence of this increased life expectancy??

Chris Brooks&lt;Pro - Fluoride&gt;, Bolton says...
12:25pm Thu 7 Feb 08

boris, a joint study from universities of Sheffield& Bristol showed Manchester had the lowest life expectancy in England. Scotland was worse,also non-fluoridated.

boris, west sussex says...
12:32pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris

I assume you reject the data I posted, so I'm to believe your University study??

I would add Chris, we are bombarded with caffeine facts, sugar, salt etc. These studies change every few months. Are these people playing games, or could it be that they haven't got a clue. They have to produce some flannel for us plebes, otherwise why pay them.

Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
12:41pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris, using your argument. Manchester also has the highest personal debt. Manchester also allegedly has the highest rate of smoking related cancer deaths.As do many places in Scotland. Where I think it's fair to say, life expectancy in some areas are lower than comparable in England.

Tubby Scruff, Alderley Edge says...
12:44pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Second or third, was Glasgow I understand, sorry to have missed that off.

boris, west sussex says...
12:49pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris


Do you accept, if there is any doubt about long term health, even if small, then this madness should be shelved immediately???

Chris Brooks&lt;Pro - Fluoride&gt;, Bolton says...
1:17pm Thu 7 Feb 08

bori, yes.

Chris Brooks&lt;Pro - Fluoride&gt;, Bolton says...
1:19pm Thu 7 Feb 08

boris,sorry! Yes

boris, west sussex says...
1:28pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris wrote

boris,sorry! Yes


Then it must be shelved, as there is doubt.

Chris Brooks&lt;Pro - Fluoride&gt;, Bolton says...
1:35pm Thu 7 Feb 08

boris,why don`t the anti-fluoride groups try to persuade the people of Solihull<lowest decay rates in 5 year olds in the UK> of the health benefits of drinking non-fluoridated water? Fluoride in drinking water also benefits people who have kept their teeth into old age, many of whom can find that declining manual dexterity and sometimes dementia can have a catastrophic impact on their oral health .Many medicines,cause dry mouth through reduced saliva output, and fluoride will help to counteract the devastating impact of root caries in these vulnerable people.

boris, west sussex says...
1:44pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris wrote

Fluoride in drinking water also benefits people who have kept their teeth into old age, many of whom can find that declining manual dexterity and sometimes dementia can have a catastrophic impact on their oral health .Many medicines,cause dry mouth through reduced saliva output, and fluoride will help to counteract the devastating impact of root caries in these vulnerable people.



Chris smoking is known to reduce the chances of getting Alzheimer's and Parkinson's decease, does this mean every one should take up smoking?? I promise I'm not trying to launch a smoking debate, just point out you are coming from one angle, like I am with the Parkinsons and Alzheimers comment. What about the negative sides of long term exposure to fluoride??

Lollipop, Muddy Duct says...
2:26pm Thu 7 Feb 08

Chris Brooks<Pro - Fluoride> wrote:
boris,why don`t the anti-fluoride groups try to persuade the people of Solihull<lowest decay rates in 5 year olds in the UK> of the health benefits of drinking non-fluoridated water? Fluoride in drinking water also benefits people who have kept their teeth into old age, many of whom can find that declining manual dexterity and sometimes dementia can have a catastrophic impact on their oral health .Many medicines,cause dry mouth through reduced saliva output, and fluoride will help to counteract the devastating impact of root caries in these vulnerable people.
Watching a debate on BBC1 yesterday it was said that Birmingham spends more per year on Dental Health than Manchester. Excluding the cost of putting flouride in the water.

Zimmy, Bolton says...
2:34pm Thu 7 Feb 08

flouride is fine its that fluoride thats the bummer

boris, west sussex says...
3:16pm Thu 7 Feb 08

This is the input from a waste of space, otherwise known as Zimmy (Erica)

Flouride ??Is that when you screw a bag of flour. doesnt your man thing go white ?? C'mon tell us BN. I demand a n answer



so you crap.ped yourself about going to town ??


So you crap.ped yourselves again just as you did on Bolton station years back.
So you stay behind closed doors afraid of what may happen.
white feathers to the bolton mob




John, Yorkshire says...
4:25pm Fri 8 Feb 08

I am a dentist who used to work in Birmingham which has had fluoridated water since 1964. When I moved north to Yorkshire I found that the children had much more tooth decay and needed much more dental treatment. It is about time children in the North West and Yorkshire had the benefits which children in the Midlands have had for over 40 years now.

Your sayYourtheboltonnews

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Bolton News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »