MP says exam reform plan would take country back to the 1950s (From The Bolton News)

Does anybody seriously believe that employers looking at a string of GCSE certificates, which clearly indicate that the owner has achieved very little in the way of academic success, are convinced otherwise. The ECB, which will concentrate on what any serious parent considers to be "the core subjects, will strenghten our childrens grasp of three subjects which form the basis of all other elements of their acedemic work. Far too many of our kids are walking out of school with a pile of certificates, yet are unable to write decent sentences with proper punctuation and spelling, or do simple mathematical calculations in their head. You simply will not be able to do computer science, design and technology or engineering without a good standard of English, maths and science. The current GCSE system puts too much value on quantity and not enough on quality. That is exactly Mr Goves point.
Ms Hilling's final point about a final examination is nonsense. To pass any examination, which is correctly set, requires an in depth knowledge of the subject not simply a good memory. Perhaps she can explain the difference between good memory and good understanding??? One is a direct result of the other.

PDY wrote:
Does anybody seriously believe that employers looking at a string of GCSE certificates, which clearly indicate that the owner has achieved very little in the way of academic success, are convinced otherwise. The ECB, which will concentrate on what any serious parent considers to be "the core subjects, will strenghten our childrens grasp of three subjects which form the basis of all other elements of their acedemic work. Far too many of our kids are walking out of school with a pile of certificates, yet are unable to write decent sentences with proper punctuation and spelling, or do simple mathematical calculations in their head. You simply will not be able to do computer science, design and technology or engineering without a good standard of English, maths and science. The current GCSE system puts too much value on quantity and not enough on quality. That is exactly Mr Goves point.
Ms Hilling's final point about a final examination is nonsense. To pass any examination, which is correctly set, requires an in depth knowledge of the subject not simply a good memory. Perhaps she can explain the difference between good memory and good understanding??? One is a direct result of the other.

I am afraid she probably cannot, after all, she does vote Labour! Her whole argument, and that of those with similar views, is misguided and mis-informed. The GCE system aims at handing out as many passes as possible, with only a marginal knowledge of any one subject. Jack of all trades but master of none, springs to mind.

I agree I have 2 sons who are now left school but not that long ago..
I was told by the English teacher at their high school they attended
" They don't need to be able to spell and punctuate correctly as long as when I read it I can get the general meaning "

Some education that is !! welcome back the 1950s education standards
I am just sorry my sons are too old to feel its benifits
I got fed up of chasing teachers about my sons education or lack of it..to be fobbed off with "He's a boy he will catch up next year" or "He is next years teachers problem not mine now "
My Son was Dyslexic and Dysphraxic and needed support of which he got little or none except " if you pay for extra clesses it will help "
Its time our system got a major overhaul and teachers who are not in th eproffession for the right reasons give up their nice salary and plush holidays for someone who is willing to educate our kids

A return to the 1950's would,it seems,be far preferable to most people than carrying on with the shameful educational standards of the past few years.

The education system of the 50's. was an era when teaching was a respected profession . a time when knowledge was gained from books, using your brain and memory .education enforced with discipline . The only thing you pressed at school .in that era.was your luck . No such thing as calculators and P.C access , just a blackboard for the teacher and exercise books for pupils.and god help you if you made a mess in said book but in the end 95% of the pupils could read and write spell and have a pretty good knowledge of maths

My daughter is just nine years old, but already she does most of her school work using a school-provided Ipad, and then brings it home to play one of the many games her teacher has downloaded for them to play when they are bored at school! Ask her any question about any subject, and up it pops on her search engine. At the end of this expensive education, she will talk away with a fine bunch of certificates proving she knows it all! What ever happened to teachers covered in chalk, pupils sat around the family dining table, diligently doing their homework, and making sure not only where the answers right, but that the presentation and layout where also neat and tidy? I still keep in touch with many of my teachers, over forty years after leaving school; how many of todays' kids even know their teacher's name?

berushka wrote:
My daughter is just nine years old, but already she does most of her school work using a school-provided Ipad, and then brings it home to play one of the many games her teacher has downloaded for them to play when they are bored at school! Ask her any question about any subject, and up it pops on her search engine. At the end of this expensive education, she will talk away with a fine bunch of certificates proving she knows it all! What ever happened to teachers covered in chalk, pupils sat around the family dining table, diligently doing their homework, and making sure not only where the answers right, but that the presentation and layout where also neat and tidy? I still keep in touch with many of my teachers, over forty years after leaving school; how many of todays' kids even know their teacher's name?

Crikey, your old teachers must be cracking on if you are still in touch with them over forty years after leaving school. For starters, that makes you at least 55!

Assuming they taught you for just your very last year, none of them can be younger than 76.

Hulton Park wrote:

berushka wrote: My daughter is just nine years old, but already she does most of her school work using a school-provided Ipad, and then brings it home to play one of the many games her teacher has downloaded for them to play when they are bored at school! Ask her any question about any subject, and up it pops on her search engine. At the end of this expensive education, she will talk away with a fine bunch of certificates proving she knows it all! What ever happened to teachers covered in chalk, pupils sat around the family dining table, diligently doing their homework, and making sure not only where the answers right, but that the presentation and layout where also neat and tidy? I still keep in touch with many of my teachers, over forty years after leaving school; how many of todays' kids even know their teacher's name?

Crikey, your old teachers must be cracking on if you are still in touch with them over forty years after leaving school. For starters, that makes you at least 55! Assuming they taught you for just your very last year, none of them can be younger than 76.

Correction: 56 and 77. I forgot about the raising of the school leaving age in 1968!