MP says exam reform plan would take country back to the 1950s
9:00am Monday 4th February 2013 in News
MP Julie Hilling has accused Education Minister Michael Gove of being “old fashioned” and taking the country back to the 1950s as the fall-out over his plans to overhaul GCSEs rages on.
The Commons Education Select Committee, made up of a cross-party group of MPs, has published a damning report into the plans to axe GCSEs in favour of the English Baccalaureate Certificates (EBCs) in English, maths and science.
The reforms have been criticised by local headteachers, including the head of Bolton School Boys’ Division, which is one of the country top schools.
Now Bolton West MP Ms Hilling has voiced her concerns over the reforms where there will be a single end-of-course exam and limited subjects will form part of the EBCs leading to fears the remaining GCSEs will be discredited.
A Statement of Achievement, which was described as having the potential to become a “badge of failure”, would be introduced for lower attaining pupils.
Ms Hilling said: “The Government’s proposals for the English Baccalaureate fail young people in a number of ways.
“Firstly some people will leave school simply with a certificate of achievement rather than any qualifications which takes us back to the days before GCSEs.
“Secondly, Mr Gove has a very old fashioned view of education and has excluded the subjects that are critical to our future competitiveness like computer science, design and technology, construction and engineering which will divert pupils away from these crucial qualifications.
“Thirdly, understanding and ability in a subject will simply be tested in a three-hour exam which so often measures memory rather than depth of knowledge.
Finally, it will discredit GCSEs that are not changed.
“Already major manufacturers are looking to other countries to recruit graduate engineers because we are not producing enough and I absolutely agree with my local headteacher who contacted me after the changes were first announced to say he went to bed in 2012 and woke up in 1956.”
Comments are closed on this article.

Comments (8)
11:04am Mon 4 Feb 13
PDY says...
Ms Hilling's final point about a final examination is nonsense. To pass any examination, which is correctly set, requires an in depth knowledge of the subject not simply a good memory. Perhaps she can explain the difference between good memory and good understanding??? One is a direct result of the other.
11:47am Mon 4 Feb 13
berushka says...
1:02pm Mon 4 Feb 13
Sparkiedog1 says...
I was told by the English teacher at their high school they attended
" They don't need to be able to spell and punctuate correctly as long as when I read it I can get the general meaning "
Some education that is !! welcome back the 1950s education standards
I am just sorry my sons are too old to feel its benifits
I got fed up of chasing teachers about my sons education or lack of it..to be fobbed off with "He's a boy he will catch up next year" or "He is next years teachers problem not mine now "
My Son was Dyslexic and Dysphraxic and needed support of which he got little or none except " if you pay for extra clesses it will help "
Its time our system got a major overhaul and teachers who are not in th eproffession for the right reasons give up their nice salary and plush holidays for someone who is willing to educate our kids
4:52pm Mon 4 Feb 13
steveG says...
8:58pm Mon 4 Feb 13
dougie kay says...
9:22am Tue 5 Feb 13
berushka says...
5:46pm Tue 5 Feb 13
Hulton Park says...
Assuming they taught you for just your very last year, none of them can be younger than 76.
5:48pm Tue 5 Feb 13
Hulton Park says...