I HAVE no wish or intention to sound like Gardening Which?
Their remit is to and criticise or praise specific garden centres.
This includes the garden departments attached to D I Y stores such as B
& Q and Texas.
I will take a more general tack. For quality and prices, garden
centres get big stick at times. It is sometimes justified and sometimes
not.
What is not appreciated is that these centres in general are out to
give the customer service.
They have invested a lot of capital. The main weakness in some centres
is poor management or poor staff.
You can't expect every member of staff to be a fund of gardening
knowledge.
The public sometimes expect this. I know exactly the situation because
I spent years of my early life behind the counter of a busy seed shop.
It is amazing what information you can pick up when you are handling
goods day in and day out.
Management now appreciate the need for staff training, and, where
practical, this is provided.
This is particularly true in general supermarkets. There is a plant
section, and it only needs a few days of bad conditions and the plants
will never be the same again.
Perhaps the biggest complaint relates to long-term shrubby plants.
They can very soon deteriorate if not fed and watered intelligently.
Sometimes they have been around for a considerable time and become
excessively root-bound.
Well-managed centres are very careful to keep the quality of their
stock high. They are ruthless in disposing of anything which does not
reach a sufficiently high standard.
To summarise -- garden centres vary a lot. You have to shop around and
see which one offers the best range and prices consistent with quality.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article