LANGUAGE, always a delight, has come into its own these past few days
in areas where normally the banal holds sway . . . in the on-going Tales
of the House of Windsor, the dull-minded horror of the IRA, and the ever
with us hooligan horde now identified by the Prime Minister as ''The Yob
Culture''. I refer to the words ''pamper'', ''appeasement'', and
''exuberance''.
Pamper -- long ago hijacked as the trade name of an apparently
essential nether garment for babies of the disposable generation -- was
used on this occasion by an angry MP to describe members of the court of
Camelot, the all-things-to-all-men showbiz hot property that has, in
recent years, replaced this country's First Family.
The MP was angry, as were -- one imagines -- many others, to learn of
the high cost to the public purse of the royal family and their court in
telephone bills, grace and favour residences, up-keep of palaces and the
like. Twenty million pounds in these belt-tightening days does not look
like a taut ship. A phone bill running out at #1500 a year for each and
every member of the royal household -- the thick end of three-quarters
of a million pounds all in -- gives the impression of profligacy, even
if one merely breathes at the recipient when the call is connected.
But it is doubtful if the criticism has struck home. In an undertaking
that has 15 royal properties and some 500 members in the royal
household, including a Sculptor in Ordinary, a Hereditary Carver, a
Warden of the Swans, and even, with prescience, a Coroner, the word
pamper probably left them non-plussed. I imagine that the Captain
General of the combined Cadet Force -- those skinny would-be Rambos
which Britain so oddly trains to kill for Queen and Country from age 14
up -- was puzzled. She may well have turned to the Colonel-in-Chief of
the Royal Australian Corps of Electrical and Mechanical Engineers to get
the distilled wisdom of one whose family successfully weathered a
name-change, transmogrified from a coloured sponge cake to an unscalable
Munro. Can it have been in both their minds that the Honorary Air
Commodore for RAF Wittering, notwithstanding her pleadings of
incompetence with pay-phone and parking meter, had been going on a bit?
Too much self-inflicted exposure in the popular press, air-brushed or
otherwise, too many revelations of privilege and greed, spectacular and
crass consumption that far outweighs in-put -- and no comeuppance -- all
add up in the public mind to a clear understanding of just what is meant
by pamper.
But what do we mean by ''appeasement''? That is the word -- it has
become an allegation -- that is being used in connection with the
treatment of IRA prisoners at the formerly allegedly high security
Whitemoor Prison from which five of the bhoys, armed and as dangerous as
always, legged it at the start of the weekend. Staff there claim they
are discouraged from searching food parcels -- presumably for the
presence of that popular prison delicacy, file-cake -- and that their
superiors have bowed to intimidation by terrorist prisoners,
discouraging the prison officers from antagonising them, their relatives
or their legal advisers. A policy of appeasement, they say, is in
operation.
That would be an allegation fit to shock every man, woman, and child
in this country and upset even the horses in the shafts were it not for
the fact that the public at large, thanks to politicians, has discovered
the meaning of the phrase ''hidden agenda''. Given that they already
know the meaning of pamper this is now an educated public well able to
judge just what is likely to have been going on -- or not -- at
Whitemoor Prison. Lavish praise has been heaped by those who should
carry the can on those who brought back the run-aways who should not, in
the first case, have been on the loose . . . which, as the Great British
Public knows, can be summed up in the word ''diversion'': a word that so
often comes to mind before the word ''whitewash'' which is uttered on
the publication, months later, of the results of an inquiry into a murky
affair.
And so to ''exuberance'', the bon mot employed by Tory chairman Jeremy
Hanley to blow out of the water his boss's latest attempt to win hearts
and minds already taken up with pamper and appeasement. John Major may
have thought he had come up with a fire-proof slogan when he unburdened
himself on the subject of the Yob Culture but now he knows that, as with
Back to Basics, a lieutenant needed but a few hours to turn even the
stoutest platform into a badly charred ruin.
Mr Hanley was giving his opinion on the behaviour of fans at a boxing
tournament who got tore in themselves and used chairs to drive the point
of their argument into the heads of those less intellectually favoured
than themselves. Mr Hanley thought this behaviour ''exuberant''. Now he
says he has thought again. Alas for Mr Hanley the GBP also knows the
full meaning of the phrase ''second thoughts''. They know that second
thoughts can follow exuberance after a phone call from Number Ten and a
late-awakened self-interest for one's political future.
Yobs, says Mr Major, have been pampered. Hitler, we know, was
appeased. And exuberance, as Mr Hanley has discovered, was a gaffe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article