News RSS Feed


Forum Letters Video Music Box

Congestion charge vote: So what happens next?

10:30am Sunday 14th December 2008

comment Comments (18)   Have your say »


Plans for a congestion charge for Greater Manchester have been given the red light by voters - but they are asking what will happen next.

Almost two million ballot papers were posted out to residents in the 10 local authority areas last month and all 10 voted to reject the proposals.

Your Vote

Are you confident the council will follow the congestion charge "no" vote?

Yes:
Blue bar used for ballot results 25%

No:
Yellow bar used for ballot results 75%


Of Bolton's electorate of 199,819, 48.8 per cent voted. Figures announced just moments ago revealed 76,910 voted against the proposals, with 20,529 voting yes. In Bury, where there is an electorate of 140,441, 57.4 per cent voted, with 16,563, for and 64,001 against.

Highest turn-out was Trafford with 63.6pc. Lowest Manchester with 46.1pc making Bolton the eighth lowest.

The deadline for ballots to be returned was 10pm last night. The result came in at 12.20pm.

The results, announced by returning officer Sir Neil McIntosh at Manchester Central conference centre, will deal a fatal blow to the scheme, which would have created the country’s biggest road congestion zone, charging drivers up to £5 a day to use the region’s roads.

It could also spell the end for any further plans to introduce similar schemes, given the resounding rejection by voters.

Each of the councils across Greater Manchester must now cast a vote on whether they support the charge which forms part of a £3 billion TIF bid for cash.

That decision will be made next Friday.

If at least seven said yes, the deal would have gone ahead, bringing a new transport interchange, better rail facilities and more buses for Bolton.

Bolton MPs Brian Iddon and Ruth Kelly backed the bid, while David Crausby said he was against the proposals.

The congestion charge would have been be a peak-time, weekday levy for traffic in and out of Manchester city centre and within the M60.



Your Say YourThe Bolton News

boltonian68, Bradshaw says...
2:00pm Fri 12 Dec 08

Congestion Charge
The outcome of the referendum is a fantastic example of democracy at work. Let's have more operations like this on local issues so that our "elected" representatives are obliged to do WHAT WE WANT THEM TO DO, NOT WHAT THEY THINK IS BEST FOR US or perhaps WHAT IS BEST FOR THEM!!!

Well done voters in Bolton.

Royc, Blackrod says...
3:31pm Fri 12 Dec 08

The public have shown again that they have more common sense than the politicians.

Great result but no doubt they will now try and get it through some other way. These public paid quangos dont ever give up until they get the vote they want, or find some backdoor way of getting their own way.

Delighted. (For now) Blackrod

Grateful Dave, Bolton says...
5:28pm Fri 12 Dec 08

Great News: The next thing to overturn will possibly be the Flouridation of Bolton, now that we've seen it can work let's get people power to kill this one off too. pity it didn't work with the Market Hall!!!

Athertonian, Over Hulton says...
5:57pm Fri 12 Dec 08

Great news. There was never anything new in this for Bolton anyway.

Now to throw off the shackles of the GMPTE ...

lancsman, harwood says...
7:05pm Fri 12 Dec 08

Well said Athertonian, the GMPTE are only interested in manchester. All the proposals in the funding were designed only to get people into manchester,not around grt manchester.
Bolton needs its own transport infastructure. Trams to atherton/leigh and Bury are what Bolton needs,not trams to manchester.

Megawatt, Bury, Lancashire says...
7:40pm Fri 12 Dec 08

Here in Bury (Lancashire) I would like to see better transport AWAY from manchester. Or at least round it.
I agree with all the former comments.
Well voted.

chipbutty, bolton says...
9:17pm Fri 12 Dec 08

This result is an example of why there should not be referendums on important issues. Ask people if they want to pay an extra tax/charge and they will say NO regardless of the consequences.
Congestion in and around Manchester will not go away, it will get worse with a knock-on effect and cost to everyone.
Talk of "the people have spoken" and "the powers that be should do what the people want" is nonsense. The average person does not have all the facts and are easily swayed by pressure groups who generally have no alternative suggestions and rely on the base argument of "Don't pay more tax". Leave elected members to make the important decisions, decisions that make real differences to peoples lives and if you don't like what they do, vote them out at the next opportunity.

Athertonian, Over Hulton says...
2:18am Sat 13 Dec 08

The trouble is, Chipbutty, that we can't vote them out. The AGMA crew are a self-appointed coterie without any direct democratic mandate.

You wouldn't happen to be an ex-councillor, would you?

rostron, horwich says...
5:25am Sat 13 Dec 08

I checked up on this,unless you had lots of appointments & registered,you would be paying to attend hospitals, eg Christies,then car parking charges on top.
Everyone would have been asking for later times to avoid this throwing the system of hospital in chaos.
We the people have spoken, I wait now for the other sneaky way they will try to do this.

Oode, Howfan says...
9:06am Sat 13 Dec 08

Well what can i say it's all been said.

lancsman, harwood says...
11:08am Sat 13 Dec 08

chipbutty,the result just shows how detached from public opinion these so called 'elected members' are! I dont live in manchester, i live in Bolton. Manchesters traffic problems are manchesters traffic problems. I wanted better public transport in and around Bolton,less traffic congestion in Bolton. These 'elected members' are not interested in anything other than manchester. THATS why the proposals offered no benefits to any of the other nine boroughs and THATS why the public voted NO!

smotch, atherton says...
11:52am Sat 13 Dec 08

this was always going to be a cost issue and all the electorate affected by the charge would obviously exercise their right to vote against a congestion charge.almost half of the electorate however did not vote and these people are the ones who have no financial interest in the scheme.
the problem now is that something needs to be done about the congestion into manchester and there is no doubt that a scheme will be put into place but at the cost of everyone in greater manchester through an increase in council rates rather than from the people directly involved in causing the congestion.we need something to prise these drivers fom their metal wombs and onto public transport,and this was an oportunity missed.

grannigrump, bolton says...
12:26pm Sat 13 Dec 08

the flaw with the congestion charge proposal was that so-called benefits were minimal to outlying districts of Gr.Manchester.To tempt people out of their cars, public transport needs to be reliable, clean and cheap to travel on.None of the above apply at the moment. Buses seem to turn up when they feel like it, fares are exorbitant, and most important of all,turkeys don't vote for Christmas! The charging scheme was fuzzed, with no guarantee that the price would be doubled or trebled once in place. If this was to happen,commuters would have no choice but to pay it or find another job.

Nelson, Benalmadena Pueblo says...
6:59pm Sun 14 Dec 08

Chip Butty.

Stalin would have been proud of you. He too had a low opinion of the views of the people. Perhaps you could get a job in Brussels working for the EUSSR as a Commisar

chipbutty, bolton says...
7:23pm Sun 14 Dec 08

Thanks Landsman for making my point. You obviously didn't know what the deal was when you voted against. You, and I guess many thousands more didn't understand that if you did not drive into Manchester at peak periods you would not have to pay the charge but Bolton's public transport would benefit. The NO campaign group put forward no alternative suggestion as to what needs to be done. Their entire message was "No more tax" and "Don't be blackmailed". Pathetic.

lancsman, harwood says...
7:53pm Sun 14 Dec 08

On the contary chipbutty,Boltons public transport would NOT have benefitted,thats the point. Extra carriages on trains to manchester and a rapid bus transit system to manchester wouldnt have benefitted Bolton,it would only of benefitted manchester.
If there had been any real gains for Bolton,then i would have voted YES. However the whole scheme was so manchester-centric that nobody was fooled.

chipbutty, bolton says...
8:56am Wed 17 Dec 08

You still don't get it Lancsman. Extra carriages and an improved bus service is not for Manchester but for people travelling to Manchester. Once again, if you don't travel to Manchester at peak times you would not have had to pay Th charge.
I'm still waiting for the No supporters to come forward with an idea, any idea of how to solve the problem of traffic congestion.

Athertonian, Over Hulton says...
6:22pm Wed 17 Dec 08

Chip Butty, the "extra carriages" are refurbished hand-me-downs from other areas, and the main Manchester bus service already operates at a 10-minute frequency by the most direct non-motorway route.

The thing is, every proposal that affected Bolton was already on the table, quite independently of the TIF bid. All this would have done was to bring things forward a little.

It is not the no campaign, but the GMPTE's paucity of imagination that is the problem.

Locally, its lack of real initiative in the Bolton and Wigan areas is appalling. If, as has happened, Bolton and Wigan, councils of the same political hue demand, and get, rebates because of poor investment in transport, you can bet things are a good deal worse than is leaking out to the public. How can you have faith in an organisation that, as part of a supposedly sophisticated campaign, advertised on Wigan buses more trains for Ashton, and a guided bus for Wigan - when Ashton in fact has no station, and the planned pseudo-tram stops at Leigh, 7 miles short of Wigan? What a gaffe. They clearly don't even know their constituency.

More broadly, creating the world's largest congestion charge zone - far bigger than London's - was a nonsense, not least because the transport improvement package was insufficient and too patchy to justify it, with over half the ACTUAL extra funding being spent on a new tramline for relatively prosperous south Manchester. Perhaps it should be borne in mind that the GMPTA's chief officer's day job is town clerk of Manchester!

Is this being parochial? By no means. It is rather the "little Manchester" mentality - a perfect replica in miniature of the London metropolitanism decried by our "core cities" - that is the problem. A regional problem needs a regional solution. Moreover, there were no extra powers to rein in First or Stagecoach - on whose whims we would continue to have to rely(or rather, not!)under a set-up that has, for us, delivered a less integrated, less reliable and just plain worse system, with fewer links, than we had 40 years ago.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »