Councillors divided after losing access to pensions
11:10am Tuesday 1st January 2013 in Local
BOLTON councillors have produced mixed reactions to the news that they can no longer qualify for local government pension schemes.
Brandon Lewis, the undersecretary of state for communities and local government, has announced the launch of a consultation on plans to stop councillors’ access to taxpayer-funded pension schemes from April 2014.
He said the current set-up contributed to a “corrosive influence on local democracy”
which “blurred the distinction between council staff and councillors”.
He said: “Councillors are volunteers undertaking public service.
“They are not professional, full-time politicians, nor should they be encouraged to become so.”
Cllr Linda Thomas, Bolton Council’s deputy leader and Labour councillor for Halliwell, said: “The role of local councillors now is as demanding on time and effort as it is on those in national office.
“Many councillors forgo their careers and hence the ability to increase their pension contributions, which would have been the case if they not been elected as councillors to serve the public.
“Once again the government is jumping on the populist band wagon, downgrading the worth of local councillors, which will do nothing to encourage those on low incomes and women who often juggle families, jobs and their council duties to become local voices for their communities.”
Bolton Conservative leader Cllr David Greenhalgh said: “I welcome the proposals.
“I have always disagreed with taxpayers’ money contributing to make up councillors’ pensions and have thought it wrong that councillors were ever included in the council pension scheme.
“I do not take advantage of the scheme and never have.”
Conservative deputy leader Cllr Andy Morgan said: “Councillors are not employees of the council and should never have been given the opportunity to join the scheme in the first place.
“When we are in such financial dire straits, such perks which are costing the taxpayer have to be sacrificed.”
Liberal Democrat leader Cllr Roger Hayes disagreed with the plans.
He said: “I have never taken up the option of the local government pension scheme as I am well covered by pensions earned in my employment in private industry.
“I do not believe that any of my group is in the scheme either.
“However, I believe it is right that younger councillors, who often give many hours of work for their constituents, should be able to go into the scheme if they wish, so I regret the decision of the government.”
Comments are closed on this article.

Comments (16)
11:33am Tue 1 Jan 13
binmans wages reduced says...
12:23pm Tue 1 Jan 13
oftbewildered2 says...
12:23pm Tue 1 Jan 13
Rocket_Scientist says...
12:49pm Tue 1 Jan 13
boydell says...
1:26pm Tue 1 Jan 13
steveG says...
1:44pm Tue 1 Jan 13
boltonnut says...
1:48pm Tue 1 Jan 13
boydell says...
Simple question -simple answer !!
2:14pm Tue 1 Jan 13
Beyond News Forum says...
4:00pm Tue 1 Jan 13
raggadaddy says...
5:28pm Tue 1 Jan 13
berushka says...
6:45pm Tue 1 Jan 13
Tel30 says...
8:25pm Tue 1 Jan 13
Beyond News Forum says...
*coffs* Sounds like a conscious to me... guilty one?
6:55am Thu 3 Jan 13
Hulton Park says...
Plus, get yourself on to one or more of the Greater Manchester quangos, and you're made - a job for life, barring anything actually criminal. No-one to vote you off and even demonstrable, rank incompetence won't shift you.
7:03am Thu 3 Jan 13
Hulton Park says...
We have twenty wards in Bolton. We could increase the number of wards to thirty, making them more local, but with only one councillor in each.
This would also rid us of the painful three-yearly cycle of elections - with single-member wards,a clean sweep of the Council would be much easier and quicker if the electorate were unhappy.
7:08am Thu 3 Jan 13
Hulton Park says...
Travel and expenses were on top of that.
3:24pm Thu 3 Jan 13
sallyupsteps says...