Airline worker fined for customs evasion

First published in North West

AN airline worker has been fined £1,000 for attempting to smuggle cigarettes into the UK through Manchester Airport.

David Martin Cooke (51) of Shipham Close, Leigh was arrested on December 8, 2012 by Border Force officers when he attempted to pass through the Customs Green Channel at Manchester Airport with 1,320 duty-free cigarettes, plus other duty-free tobacco and alcoholic products after arriving on a flight from Goa.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) investigators interviewed him and he was later charged with duty evasion offences.

Mike O’Grady Assistant Director Criminal Investigation, HMRC said: “Airline employees, whatever their role, hold a ‘position of trust’ and abusing such privileges in order to smuggle is a serious matter. Cooke gave weak excuses for his holiday crime. There are no excuses for smuggling whatever your status. Tobacco fraud costs honest taxpayers more than £2bn a year, undercutting honest businesses, and drawing people into wider criminality. Anyone with information about illicit tobacco sales or smuggling should contact the Customs’ Hotline on 0800 59 5000.”

At Trafford Magistrates Court on Thursday, January 3, Cooke admitted that the 1,320 cigarettes, 750 gms of hand rolling tobacco and two litres of vodka in his luggage were not UK duty paid and that he was attempting to evade over £528 in excise duty. He pleaded guilty to the fraudulent evasion of excise duty, an offence under the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979.

Cooke was fined £1,000 plus £85 costs and has to pay a £100 victims’ support surcharge. The duty free goods have been forfeited.

Comments

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree