America has a higher abortion rate than any other nation. Yet no other
Western country is more torn on an issue which has put doctors literally
in the firing line. Ros Davidson reports
WHEN the UN population conference opens today in Cairo amidst threats
of terrorism, abortion will be among the most heated issues. And no
other Western country is more torn about it than America. At a recent
press conference hurriedly scheduled after an anti-abortion outcry,
Vice-President Al Gore promised that the Clinton administration will not
impose its mildly pro-choice views on other countries.
Ironically, America has a higher abortion rate than any other
industrialised nation, three times as high as Scotland's and twice as
high as England and Wales. Yet anger about abortion as a social,
medical, and moral issue is more violent in America than anywhere else
in the industrialised world.
Since abortion was declared a US constitutional right in 1973, there
have been three murders and two attempted murders by anti-abortion
activists. In October, Paul Hill will be tried for two killings, of an
abortion doctor and a volunteer in late July in Florida. The former
Presbyterian minister, who says killing abortion doctors is morally
justified, is also accused of trying to murder a third person outside
the clinic.
Indeed, for 20 years America's abortion clinics have been swamped with
tens of thousands of bombings, death threats, arsons, stalkings,
kidnappings, chemical attacks, pickets, and blockades. Reported
incidents against anti-abortionists are rare, but include bomb and death
threats, an arson attack and one car sabotage.
America's fundamentalism, its strongly anti-abortion religious
institutions and puritanism fuel the controversy. Its political
structure and heterogeneous population also lead to stark national
differences. Abortion was legalised in New York in 1970, but just last
month the federal government had to force Louisiana to fund abortions
for poor victims of rape and incest.
The Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision, declaring abortion a
constitutional right, was an aberration of judicial activism, at odds
with Middle America's anti-abortionism, says Michele Arocha Allen of the
National Right to Life Committee, the largest anti-abortion group. Yet
opinion polls actually show most Americans want legal abortion within
certain limits, says Malcolm Goggin, a political scientist at University
of Houston, author of Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, and
who taught recently at Strathclyde University.
But Roe v. Wade clearly incensed the religious right, already powerful
since the 1970s' fight over gender equality and the Equal Rights
Amendment, says Nancy Ammerman, a sociologist at Emory University. Both
Reagan and Bush were powerfully anti-abortion and, with conservative
Supreme Court appointments, brought an erosion of its availability. In
1979, the states became more empowered to draft abortion laws, and in
1992 Roe v. Wade was challenged and upheld, although weakened
significantly.
Despite Clinton's tentatively pro-choice views, millions are finding
access increasingly limited. Congress passed a Bill in May banning
blockades, violence, and threats against abortion clinics. But the
procedure is at its lowest rate in America since 1976, according to a
study released this summer by The Alan Guttmacher Institute.
Access to the abortion is striking. As many as 94% of rural counties
have no abortion providers, while eight in 10 of all counties have none.
Fewer hospitals and clinics offer the procedure, and fewer doctors are
training to do it, even if they specialise in obstetrics and
gynaecology. Increasingly, abortions are ghettoised -- offered only at
specialised clinics by doctors who do little else.
With America's privatised health system, legal abortion is also often
out of reach. (Many seeking abortions at clinics are poor, teenage, and
minority.) Federal money is limited to abortion after rape, incest, or
if the woman's life is endangered. Indeed, several states including
Colorado and Michigan have tried to outlaw funding for virtually all
cases, but are being ordered to follow federal rules.
Although the Democratic health Bills currently being debated in
Washington would make insurers cover abortion, it appears less likely
such a provision would survive a tempestuous debate, or that there will
be insurance coverage for all of America's 37 million uninsured. The
Catholic Church has threatened to mobilise its 65 million members over
abortion funding, while at least 35 members of Congress are against such
coverage.
''Many issues in America are reduced to morality very quickly,'' says
Alex Sanger, head of Planned Parenthood of New York. Indeed Planned
Parenthood, America's largest network for family planning, abortion, and
sex education, traces itself to his grandmother, Margaret Sanger,
arrested for obscenity after opening America's first birth control
clinic in 1916. She was opposed by the Church, doctors, newspapers, and
courts as an ''uppity nurse,'' he says. ''But my grandmother was never
shot at or threatened with death,'' notes Sanger.
''We have the most virulently anti-sex ethos,'' says Beverly Harrison,
a Christian ethicist at Union Theological Seminary who wrote The Right
to Choose; Towards a New Ethic of Abortion.
Harrison adds, ''The same Churches that condemned contraception are
condemning abortion.'' She says nowhere else in the West is
fundamentalism so enmeshed with the political right, and nowhere else --
not Italy nor Ireland -- has the Catholic Church taken such a stand
against abortion.
Harrison says misogyny and original sin in traditional teachings on
abortion lead to a view of ''innocent unborn children'' versus a mother
tainted by birth, womanhood, and sex.
But she also notes the pro-eugenics and racist element in America's
early birth control movement and says the liberal Churches were too
ready to embrace it despite this ''morally-dubious'' tradition.
''It's an issue of gender roles and family relations,'' says Ammerman,
the sociologist. She says America's fundamentalists see the male-headed,
two-parent family as God-given. ''Abortion is striking close to the
heart of the nature of family and who's in control,'' she says. Family
values and America's moral decay were indeed a major issue in the 1992
presidential race, says Goggin, the political scientist. ''The
perception of breakdown is so acute,'' agrees Harrison, the Christian
ethicist. ''This is the society where capitalism is eating its own
children.''
Also crucial to understanding anti-abortionism is the fundamentalist
tradition of ''an eye for an eye'' and Americans' tendency to take up
arms, says Ammerman. Since even the most moderate anti-abortion
activists say 31 million unborn children have been killed since 1973,
she concludes that extremists may too easily view murdering an abortion
doctor as ''justifiable.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article