IF I may reply to Iain Camick’s letter We can't change vote (Letters, September 15)

He refers to a leaflet sent out by the Government to every household at a cost to the taxpayer of about £9 million, part of which put the case for remaining in the EU with Mr Camick writing that this money should have been included in the Remain campaign literature.

Maybe it should.

I think, but I could be wrong, that material sent out six weeks before the vote is not counted as part of the campaign and therefore the money cannot be lumped in with the rest. However, if this was a breach of campaign funding laws, a serious offence, as was the Vote Leave campaign, then both sides, Leave and Remain, should be demanding a rerun as clearly the first vote was illegal and must be declared null and void.

The main point of my original letter was the way the government and Mrs May in particular have handled the negotiations.

She has ridden roughshod over Parliament.

It was only given a vote on triggering the article 50 process setting in train our departure because Gina Miller took the government to court; it will only get a vote on the final deal because her own Tory MPs rebelled against her.

My last word on the subject.

“When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?" John Maynard Keynes.

Eric Hyland

Harwood