EXCLUSIVE
SENIOR Scottish Liberal Democrat Donald Gorrie is set to reignite the heated debate within the party about who might be its most congenial ally in the new Holyrood Parliament.
He will tell a fringe meeting at the Liberal Democrats' national conference in
Edinburgh today that the SNP is by no means ''beyond the pale'' and could
prove
as respectable allies as Labour.
Mr Gorrie will say some Liberals see the SNP as outside the normal range of political views, and therefore not on the list of potential allies in a Scottish Parliament.
However, he believes this is a mistake and insists Liberals have a long
history
of supporting ''good nationalists''.
His comments are likely to be interpreted as an effort to counter the attack
on
the Nationalists launched at last month's Scottish conference in Aberdeen by possible leadership contender Menzies Campbell MP.
On that occasion, Mr Campbell warned that ''when Liberalism sups with Nationalists it should do so with a long spoon'' and suggested ''an
arrangement
between Liberal Democrats and Labour at Holyrood could be seen as a staging post on the progress towards realignment which has lain at the heart of the strategy of every Liberal Democrat leader I have known''.
By contrast Mr Gorrie will claim there is a long history of Liberal support
for
nationalists going back to the time when Charles James Fox and the Whigs supported the American colonies in their War of Independence.
After 1945, he recalls, the Scottish Liberals established support for a Scottish Parliament as a main pillar of their policies and later former leader
Jo Grimond also favoured cooperation with the SNP.
The Liberals, he will claim, have supported responsibe nationalists and ''good'' nationalists but this does not mean they support the SNP. They argue that in the UK responsible nationalism leads to a federal structure and not to
independence.
So they have a major policy difference with the SNP as they have with Labour
on
many issues and with the Tories on most issues. But he will add that: ''I
see
no evidence that the SNP represents the bad strands of nationalism.''
Of the present day, he will tell the Liberal Democrats' History Society: ''The
Parliament will work better if the other parties accept that the SNP is an ordinary political party which other parties oppose rather than some extreme bunch beyond the pale.
Responsible nationalism is a legitimate political philosophy and responsible nationalists are normal flawed human beings who can be respectable allies with
whom Liberal Democrats can cooperate on the right terms in promoting our
agenda
for Scotland, just as we would cooperate with Labour or with both or neither.''
However he will stress that, while both Labour and the SNP are potiential allies for the Liberal Democrats, if the price of a coalition was to promote policies they strongly opposed then the option of constructive opposition to a
minority government might prove a better choice.
Mr Gorrie, who is currently MP for Edinburgh West and heads the party's regional list in Central Scotland, will also recall that many Scottish Liberal
activists, including himself, were very angry and disappointed when the SNP withdrew from the Scottish Constitutional Convention.
''It may have been a good tactical decision for the SNP but it was a bad decision for Scotland. Many SNP members thought it was a bad decision. However
one serious error of judgement doesn't damn a party for ever.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article