THE pressures on Scottish Secretary Ian Lang to launch a
full-scale investigation into Monklands District Council increased
yesterday amid scenes of uproar in the Commons. He indicated he was
considering some form of inquiry but his powers are limited.
Scottish Question Time was dominated by exchanges on allegations that
a ''jobs for the boys'' scheme was operating in the council, which
covers the constituencies of both Labour leader John Smith and shadow
Scottish Secretary Tom Clarke.
Speaker Betty Boothroyd had to intervene frequently to bring MPs to
order as they exchanged claim and counter-claim across the Chamber.
Tempers still were frayed almost an hour after Scottish Questions ended,
with Mr George Galloway (Glasgow Hillhead -- Lab) accusing the Tories of
pouring ''buckets of smear'' over the two Monklands MPs.
Much of the anger on the Labour side was caused by the fact that the
matter was raised by Mr David Shaw (Dover), a Tory MP, who has taken a
leading role in drawing attention to the allegations because he and
others see it as a means of embarrassing Mr Smith.
He told Mr Lang that many Scottish people in his constituency who had
been ''shocked to learn that 22 relatives of Labour councillors are
employed by Monklands District Council''.
He went on: ''Are you further aware that, of those 22 relatives, three
are employed in the housing department (and) the director of housing's
wife is employed in the leisure centre?''
As Labour MPs jeered and shouted at Mr Shaw and the Speaker
intervened, the Dover MP concluded: ''The tenants and the people of
Coatbridge and Airdrie believe that they can obtain houses, obtain
transfers for council houses, and obtain repairs only if they have the
approval of the ruling Labour families on that council.''
Mr Lang made clear he was aware of the allegations but said his powers
to intervene in such matters were limited by statute.
He has powers under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to order
a local inquiry if he thinks an authority has failed to carry out a
statutory duty, or if he thinks there should be an investigation to
determine whether it has so failed.
He said he was considering whether any of the allegations made may
amount to a breach of the council's statutory duties but the indications
are that he is not satisfied that is the case.
The Scottish Secretary suggested that the matter might be pursued in
other ways -- through the courts, the Local Government Ombudsman, or the
Commission for Local Authority Accounts in Scotland -- but indicated
that he could not initiate such moves.
Mr Bill Walker (Tayside North -- Con) referred to a parliamentary
question he had tabled about ''the activities of Councillor Brooks, the
leader of the administration in Monklands District Council''.
He said he had received an ''unsatisfactory answer'' and went on:
''The question is about the amount of public money that has gone into
liquidation and another company that is still trading.
''It is only right that this House should be made aware of the public
money that has been used and also about the debt that is outstanding on
Pay as You Earn for four years on the company that has gone into
liquidation.
''These are matters that are genuinely of interest to this House,
regardless of the political colour of the individuals.''
Mr Lang replied: ''If the Commission for Local Authority Accounts in
Scotland concludes that the council has illegally authorised
expenditure, it can submit a special report to me with any
recommendations it may have. This may include the surcharging of those
responsible, and I am empowered to do so, but I have no evidence that
would be appropriate.''
During the exchanges, a furious Mr Galloway rounded on Mr Shaw,
stating that people would find it repugnant that ''a man who brought a
prostitute into this building'' should be casting aspersions on other
people's integrity and character.
Mr John Maxton (Glasgow Cathcart -- Lab) urged Mr Lang to dissociate
himself from Mr Shaw's ''irresponsible and unscrupulous campaign'', and
added: ''You should also ask him to repeat some of his allegations
outside the House, where he is not covered by parliamentary privilege.''
* Monklands is likely to overspend its budget by almost #1.6m and the
council is being forced to cut back on services and seek voluntary
redundancies from staff.
The measures will include:
* A recruitment freeze until April.
* Suspension of all but essential overtime, also until April.
* Cuts in leisure and recreation department spending.
The council is blaming the overspend for 1992-93 on high local
non-payment of the poll tax and the compulsory competitive tendering
system. Almost 20% of Monklands people liable for poll tax have still
not paid.
Councillors have been warned by finance executives that, if the
spending continues, Monklands will be charge capped next year.
A council spokesman said yesterday: ''Deficits have arisen and we are
tackling them. The fall in interest rates has helped by allowing the
council to obtain the money we need at a lower cost to us.''
He denied that the #16m Time Capsule pool and ice rink complex had
caused the overspend in the leisure and recreation department.
The council has agreed, after discussion with the Scottish
Labour Party HQ, to an independent adviser reviewing all aspects of
the council's employment policy. That is expected to begin in February.
New image11.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article