SIR: it may surprise 'Colin' (BEN April 14), to hear that I nearly always respond to the letters which I receive, especially those from constituents.
It is difficult to respond, however, to anonymous letters!
I was born into an agricultural community, and my father, as well as working on the land, was a part time butcher.
Occasionally a hunt rampaged across our countryside, trampling crops and smashing fences, hedges and ditches. So I have observed cruelty to animals at close quarters!
Michael Foster's original Bill was flawed. After all, it was a Private Member's Bill. However the faults to which 'Colin' refers, were put right in extensive committee sittings.
Clearly he hasn't read the Bill as it stands today. The one about walking a dog, which subsequently chases a mammal (of any sort), is an old chestnut!
The divine right of hereditary Peers to sit in The House of Lords, has nothing to do with democracy!
I assume Colin is an aristocrat (or has aspirations).
Brian Iddon MP
House of Commons
London
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article